Amicus Brief in Support of Judicial Review of USCIS Delay in Deciding Green Card Applications

Pinnamaraju v. Selby, No. 26-4124 (9th Cir.)

Amicus Briefs

Published: October 13, 2026

This amicus brief argues that a federal district court may review a claim that USCIS has unreasonably delayed deciding applications to adjust status to lawful permanent resident (green card applications). The district court dismissed the complaint because it concluded that a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act barred judicial review of a “decision or action” in the agency’s discretion as to green card applications. Seeking reversal, the amicus brief argues that the statute must be read as allowing review because the ordinary meaning of “decision or action” does not include failure to decide or act. The amicus brief also highlights that unlike this statute, Congress created a special definition of “agency action” in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which includes the failure to act, and provided a remedy. The amicus brief argues that the district court also can review the applicants’ mandamus claim to compel USCIS to decide. The amicus brief also argues that since jurisdiction exists, the appellate court should return the case to the district court for a decision as to the delay.

Partners

The American Immigration Council filed this amicus brief with the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

Related Resources

Map The Impact

Explore immigration data where you live

Our Map the Impact tool has comprehensive coverage of more than 100 data points about immigrants and their contributions in all 50 states and the country overall. It continues to be widely cited in places ranging from Gov. Newsom’s declaration for California’s Immigrant Heritage Month to a Forbes article and PBS’ Two Cents series that targets millennials and Gen Z.

100+

datapoints about immigrants and their contributions

America's story is an immigrant story.

logoimg